N. 32 (2015): La città ordinata. Dispositio e Forma Urbis
Articoli

La dispositio informale della "Soft Machine"

Thomas Mical
Auckland University of Technology

Pubblicato 2015-04-01

Parole chiave

  • Dispositio,
  • Soft Machine,

Come citare

Mical, T. (2015). La dispositio informale della "Soft Machine". FAMagazine. Ricerche E Progetti sull’architettura E La Città, (32), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n32-2015/94

Abstract

Questo saggio affronta i termini concettuali e le conseguenze di una forma “soft” di dispositio vitruviana come possibilità attuale della relazione tra architettura e città. La tendenza verso il “morbido” e l'informale nell'architettura e nel progetto urbano genera nuove modulazioni concettuali  del tessuto urbano. I processi sociali di assemblage di componenti corrispondono oggi ad un avanzamento, in cui una dispositio “soft” ordina le mutevoli fasi/spazi della vita urbana e sostituisce la precedente logica modernista astratta delle macchine, dello spazio striato e del determinismo funzionale.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. William S. Burroughs, The Soft Machine, 1966
  2. Sigfried Giedion, Mechanisation Takes Command: A Contribution to Anonymous History, U. Minn. Press, 2014 (1948)
  3. Reinhold Martin, The Organizational Complex, MIT Press, 2005
  4. Stewart R. Clegg and Martin Kornberger (eds.), Space, Organizations and Management Theory, CBS Press, 2006
  5. Giora Hon, Bernard R. Goldstein, From Summetria to Symmetry: The Making of a Revolutionary Scientific Concept, Springer, 2008
  6. Felix Guattari, The Mechanic Unconscious, MIT Press, 2010
  7. Rosalind Krauss, The Optical Unconscious, MIT Press, 1993
  8. Frederick Jameson, The Political Unconscious, Cornell University Press, 1982
  9. Jonathan Hughes and Simon Sadler (eds), Non-Plan : Essays on Freedom, Participation and Change in Modern Architecture and Urbanism, Routledge, 2000
  10. Sean Lally, The Air From Other Planets: A Brief history of Architecture to Come, Lars Muller, 2003
  11. Peter Zumthor, Atmospheres, Birkhäuser Architecture, 2006
  12. P. Tidwell, Tapio Wirkkala, Architecture and Atmosphere, Rut Bryk Foundation, Espoo 2014
  13. Melissa Gregg and Gregory Seigworth (eds), The Affect Theory Reader, Duke UP, 2014
  14. Robert Kronenburg’s Flexible: Architecture that Responds to Change, Laurence King, 2007
  15. UN Studio, Design Models, Thames & Hudson, 2006
  16. Yuko Hasegawa, Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa: SANAA, Phaidon, 2006
  17. Cecil Balmond, Informal, Prestel, 2007
  18. Yves-Alain Bois and Rosalind Krauss, Formless: A User’s Guide, Zone, 2007
  19. Stan Allen, Points + Lines: Diagrams and Projects for the City, Princeton Architectural Press, 1999
  20. Manuel Delenda’s “Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture.” April 2001 (link alla pagina http://www.egs.edu/faculty/manuel-de-landa/articles/deleuze-genetic-algorithm-in-architecture/)
  21. John Rachjman, The Deleuze Connections, MIT Press, 2000
  22. Ignasi de Solà-Morales, Differences: Topographies of Contemporary Architecture, MIT Press, 1997
  23. Simone Brott, Architecture for a Free Subjectivity: Deleuze and Guattari at the Horizon of the Real, Ashgate, 2011
  24. Lars Spruybroek, ‪The Architecture of Continuity: Essays and Conversations‬, V2_ publishing, 2008
  25. Manuel De Landa, “Meshworks, Hierarchies and Interfaces” in John Beckman (ed), The Virtual Dimension: Architecture, Representation, and Crash Culture, Princeton Architectural Press. 1998