Architecture post Covid-19. Using proxemics in spatial design
Anna Veronese
Fig.
1 - Edward T. Hall, La dimensione nascosta, Bompiani, 1968 and Il linguaggio silenzioso, Bompiani, 1969.
Fig.
2 - Explanatory diagram of proxemic spheres of distance.
Fig.
3 - A condominium terrace of a Roman “palazzina”, photographed on March 11th, 2020.
«This
book constitutes a highly provocative scientific contribution: even
where it can justify some objections, it will not fail to open new
avenues of research. It can be expected that it will stimulate not only
communication scholars or cultural anthropologists, but also
psychologists, educators and – above all –
architects and urban planners».
It is with these words that Umberto Eco introduces the book The Hidden Dimension,
written by the American anthropologist Edward Twitchell Hall in 1966
and published in Italy by Bompiani in 1968. In his work Hall
systematizes the reflections – already mentioned in the 1959
book The Silent Language
– that led him to the theorization of a new science:
proxemics. With the term proxemics, which comes from the union of the
words “proximity”
and “phonemics”,
Hall refers to that set of observations and theories that study the
meanings that man attributes to the concepts of distance and space.
According to Hall it is possible to identify four main spheres of
distance that mark the relationships between men and that can be
imagined as bubbles around each human being: the sphere of intimate
distance (1 to 18 inches), where the physical contact of couples or
family relationships takes place; the sphere of personal distance (1,5
to 4 ft), for interaction among friends; the sphere of social distance
(4 to 12 ft), where the exchange with colleagues or acquaintances takes
place; finally the sphere of public distance (more than 12 ft), for
public relations and speaking. While considering that the cultural
factor plays a primary role in the study of proxemics – just
think of the difference that occurs in ceremonies and human
relationships between, for example, countries of the Mediterranean and
the Far East – it is interesting to note the attempt to
establish precisely measurable spheres of distance, stable and
ready-to-use categorizations beyond cultural differences.
«The ability to recognize these various zones of involvement
and the activities, relationships, and emotions associated with each
has now become extremely important. The world's populations are
crowding into cities, and builders and speculators are packing people
into vertical filing boxes—both offices and dwellings. If one
looks at human beings in the way that the early slave traders did,
conceiving of their space requirements simply in terms of the limits of
the body, one pays very little attention to the effects of crowding.
If, however, one sees man surrounded by a series of invisible bubbles
which have measurable dimensions, architecture can be seen in a new
light. It is then possible to conceive that people can be cramped by
the spaces in which they have to live and work» (Hall 1990,
p. 129).
Today, with the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the fear of contagion
and the global spread of the same concept of social distancing, Hall's
proxemics seem to acquire a particular importance. The first months of
2020 marked an enormous change in the relationship that the
contemporary man has with time and space, highlighting the crisis of
the model of the city in which we live. The interruption of the
frenetic flow that regulates urban contexts, the redefinition (and
reshuffling) of work time and free time, the depopulation of public
places and the confinement in our homes, are some of the factors that
have exasperated the evidence of these problematic nodes.
Certain images typical of the ordinary pre-pandemic life have become
unthinkable and pose the need to redesign the places that housed them
according to new measures and new objectives. I’m thinking
about the atomization of living spaces, the studios of a few square
meters, the promiscuity and overcrowding of public transport, factories
and open space offices, and finally the management of all structures
with a collective vocation (schools, universities, museums, but also
barracks, prisons, etc.).
In a very short time, we found ourselves watching identical images of
very different cities: the threat of the virus would therefore seem to
impose a new necessity, that of rethinking spaces according to some new
global rules and needs.
In this scenario, the study of proxemics, with its vocation for the
universal synthesis of data, could be a valuable tool for the
architects called to design the city of tomorrow.
Trying to think of the classification theorized by Hall in terms of
architecture and city planning, the concept of scale immediately
emerges. We can talk about “intimate scale”
(housing), “personal scale” (spaces for interaction
among friends), “social scale” (workplaces and
schools) and “public scale” (spaces for public
relations and public speaking). With a minimum recommended distance of
at least one meter between people, we are effectively witnessing the
crushing of the intimate and personal spheres into one category. From
an architectural point of view this can be translated with the
rediscovery of “filter” areas such as courtyards,
balconies, condominium terraces and stairs: semi-public spaces that
allow the occasional extension of the private and domestic dimension in
one more open and convivial, while respecting the measures of the
social distancing. Although they are not much used in normal times,
during the last few months these spaces have made a significant
difference for those who have been able to use them and given their
number and often their considerable extension, they represent a capital
of great importance in the economy of buildings, especially in big
cities. Therefore, aiming to ensure a much greater flexibility for
living spaces in case of another confinement, their role will certainly
have to be rethought and given new value. The reconstruction of the
idea of community,
typical of places and architectures of the past and which in the
current crisis has found a new meaning, will go hand in hand with them.
From a purely urban point of view, the same idea of contraction and
expansion of space, depending on the needs of the context, is the basis
of the theory of the “elastic city” (Ware, Lobos,
Carrano 2020) and the notion of self-sufficiency of neighbourhoods or
large sectors of the city. It would be a question of thinking about a
structure on an urban scale that could be quickly divided into smaller,
temporarily autonomous units in case of necessity. Real
neighbourhoods in normal times, they would turn into self-sufficient
blocks in case of crisis: this would result in a multicentric
organization of the city, which would also offer an answer to the
problem of subordination of the suburbs to the centre. In this
hypothesis, proxemics could be useful in defining these new
neighbourhoods, establishing maximum distance spheres between the
citizens and the various goods and services of basic necessities which
are indispensable for the function of each unit in case of isolation.
The study of a system of distances “on a human
scale” within the urban fabric would also help for a
progressive abandonment of the car in favour of light mobility, with
the consequent recovery of part of the public space now occupied by
roads and parking lots.
An example of this is the project La
ville du quart d'heure, designed by Carlos Moreno1
for the city of Paris and part of Anne Hidalgo's program in the
campaign for her re-election as mayor of the city. The idea of Moreno,
a Smart City specialist, is to make all the basic social functions
within the various arrondissements
accessible to everyone in a maximum of 15 minutes on foot or by bicycle.
Though at a great cost, the pandemics of the past have certainly forced
architecture and urban planning to evolve and improve. The bubonic
plague, which spread in Europe in the fourteenth century, conditioned
the decisions on an urban scale that marked the transition from the
medieval city to the Renaissance. In the mid-19th century, the
epidemics of yellow fever and cholera inspired the urban plans of many
European and American cities - such as Haussmann's proposal for Paris
or Frederick Olmsted's proposal for New York. Plans that, with the aim
of sanitizing and making the building fabric healthy, led to the
introduction of wide roads, systems of green areas and parks inside or
on the edges of cities, sewerage infrastructures and underground water
drainages. Likewise, the spread of Spanish fever at the end of the
First World War contributed to the subsequent reflections on the post
war construction of new neighbourhoods and therefore on the expansion
of cities and suburbs, which then animated the discussions of urban
planning during the twentieth century.
The crisis we are experiencing must therefore be an opportunity, a
fundamental turning point for the evolution of both architecture and
cities. An honest analysis of the crisis we had arrived at will be of
vital importance so that we do not miss the opportunity to rectify the
approach. Architects, urban planners, engineers must have the courage
to return to listen to other professionals, anthropologists,
sociologists but also ordinary citizens, in the project of a new
normal. Books such as The
Hidden Dimension, although conceived in a very different
historical moment, can serve as a starting point for reflections that
consider all the scales
– from the city to the neighbourhoods to the buildings. We
are now facing the need to codify a new proxemics, which can help us to
go back to considering people as the active centre of the space around
them and therefore to «finding suitable methods for computing
and measuring human scale in all its dimensions including the hidden
dimensions of culture» (Hall 1990, p.179).
Notes 1
Direttore scientifico e co-fondatore della Chaire eTI (Entreprenariat
Territoire Innovation), Université Paris 1
Panthéon
– Sorbonne / IAE Sorbonne Business School.
Bibliography
ECO U. (1968) – “Edward T. Hall e la
prossemica”. In E. T. Hall, La dimensione nascosta,
Bompiani,
Milan.
HALL E.T. (1968) – La
dimensione nascosta, Bompiani, Milan.
HALL E.T. (1969) – Il linguaggio silenzioso,
Bompiani, Milan.
HALL E.T. (1990) – The Hidden Dimension,
Anchor Books, New York.
MEHTA V. (2020) – “The new proxemics: Covid-19,
social
distancing, and sociable space”. Journal of Urban Design
[online]. Available at:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13574809.2020.1785283
MORENO C. (2016) – “La ville du quart
d’heure: pour
un nouveau chrono-urbanisme”. La Tribune
[online]. Available
at: https://www.latribune.fr/regions/smart-cities/la-tribune-de-carlos-moreno/la-ville-du-quart-d-heure-pour-un-nouveau-chrono-urbanisme-604358.html
WARE J.P., LOBOS J. e CARRANO E. (2020) – “Una
proposta per
ripensare le nostre città”. Internazionale
[online]. Available at:
https://www.internazionale.it/opinione/justin-paul-ware/2020/05/12/proposta-citta-pandemia